🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that smartphones and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to enact a law increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised parents to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding statement calling for a ban for minors without guardian approval is given. Although it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a useful first step," commented a leading parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. An organization set up by the family of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts argues that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to build tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, action is primarily happening at the state government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from various figures to follow Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of the West, additional nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.

Even as this international conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and others show that states internationally are less and less willing to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.